This season’s “Cumberland Idol” – a singing competition
hosted annually on the campus of the University of the Cumberlands – is nearing
its finale, and it has so far been filled with entertaining performances,
powerful voices, and shocking eliminations. As “Cumberland Idol” has grown from
its early stages from where it began over five years ago, it has improved in
audience turnout, production quality, and overall singing talent. And this
season is no different; the cast of contestants competing the last few months
has featured more pure singing ability than any before it – at least three of
them have been blessed with high quality, recording-potential type voices.
However, if history has any intention of repeating itself again – and it has
already shown its desire to do so – then one of these outrageously talented
competitors will not win.
This has been seen time and time again throughout the
five seasons of Cumberland Idol. Last season? The most talented singer finished
third. The season before? Third again. And before that? The best singer did not
even reach the top three. Throughout the years, this particular talent show has
revealed to viewers its worst and most shameful habit; it and its voting population (mostly, the folks responsible for the majority of votes) have
shown a distinct inability to admit that the good singers are good.
Idol’s
flaws are few, but inherently obvious. Most, however, could be overlooked, with
the exception of one: the voting system currently in place is laughable at
best, and downright vomit-inducing at worst. Even despite its flaws, Idol and
its producers continually work and succeed at filling the Gatliff Chapel full
of people eager and willing to cheer on some fantastic vocalists, only to send
them back out feeling sour after eliminating yet another one of the
crowd-favorite contestants. Changing the voting system will effectively change
the competition, and it will be better rewarding and more satisfying for both
the audience and those who participate. Here’s how:
Simply put, you’ve got to do away with is the unlimited
online voting. This allows people – most of whom have never seen a Cumberland
Idol performance – to vote endlessly throughout the week from the home in Northern Kentucky, or across the border in Tennessee, or anywhere else. Cumberland Idol has reported vote tallies of over 50,000 on
numerous occasions; not bad for a school with a student body of less than 3,000
total, including graduate students. Instead, offer ONE VOTE per online user.
ONE VOTE. This can be done easily using Facebook’s “like” feature; just create
a fan page and post pictures of each contestant. In addition to the ONE VOTE
per online user, Idol vote counters should also reward those who actually
attend the program by extending them the capability of voting twice; once in
the online polls, which allows anyone to vote, and once by paper as they are
leaving the auditorium. This way, the voting becomes more balanced, more based
on performance, and it still remains secretive.
These are relatively simple changes; nothing offered here
would cause any kind of hiccup in production for those who so graciously work
to create this program. And that isn’t what I want. All I want – and this is
simple – is for the very best singers in the competition to ACTUALLY WIN the
competition based on singing ability. And I don’t believe that’s too much to
ask.